Accountability

Who Writes and Reviews This

Health-adjacent content should carry a name. This page says who is responsible for the wording on this site, what they are and are not qualified to say, and how the review process works.

Simon Šimek — Founder and Director of Research

Simon founded Quantum Meta Health UK Ltd and leads its research programme. He is based near Maribor, Slovenia, and is the point of contact for research correspondence.

He is responsible for the scope and the wording of the claims made across this site, including the decision not to publish the accuracy figures that circulate in this industry. He wrote and reviews the evidence page, and he authored the blinded diagnostic-accuracy feasibility study proposed to a university medical centre, under which the host institution holds the data, controls the methodology, conducts the analysis and retains publication rights with no sponsor veto.

Contact: simon.simek@quantummetahealth.com

How content is reviewed

Every page on this site that touches health carries a named reviewer and a visible review date. If you cannot see both, the page has not been through this process and should be treated accordingly.

  1. Drafting against the guardrails. Content is written against a published set of claim guardrails covering approved wording, wording that needs evidence on file, and wording that is not used at all.
  2. Claim check. Any factual health or research statement needs a citation, or it does not go in. Any numerical accuracy claim needs a claim file with the exact substantiation, scope, service version and date, and none currently exists.
  3. Named review. A person reads it and takes responsibility for it, with their name and the date on the page.
  4. Scheduled re-review. Pages are re-read on a quarterly cycle, and immediately if the service, the evidence or the regulatory position changes.

Our policy on credentials

This industry is full of impressive-sounding titles that nobody can evidence. QMH publishes a person’s role and affiliation, which are verifiable, and publishes qualifications only where the certificate exists and has been checked.

Where a reviewer has no listed qualification, that is not an omission. It means none has been verified and recorded, and the honest thing is to leave the field empty rather than fill it with something decorative.

Session practitioners

Wellness sessions are run by trained practitioners, and every report names the practitioner who ran the session and wrote the commentary. Practitioners work to the same claim guardrails as the site: they do not name conditions, do not assert pathogens, and do not recommend starting, stopping or changing any medication.

If you receive a report that does any of those things, that is a fault in the service. Raise it and it will be corrected.

Corrections

If something on this site is wrong, overstated, or reads as a stronger claim than the evidence supports, tell us. Corrections are made to the page and the review date is updated rather than quietly edited.

Write to help@quantummetahealth.com, or to the address above for anything about the research programme.

Questions people ask before booking

The evidence page is the clearest test of whether this policy is real.