Who this is for
- Practitioners running NLS or bioresonance equipment who want structured reporting rather than screenshots and verbal summaries.
- Technicians supporting NLS installations who need a reference point for workflow questions and software behaviour.
- Clinics adding a wellness service that need a consistent, defensible report format and a claim policy they can stand behind.
- Not for people looking for a certification shortcut. QMH does not issue clinical credentials and does not represent any training as a medical qualification.
The reporting platform
The platform turns session output into a structured, repeatable client document: consistent sections, plain-language explanations of each score, a practitioner commentary field, and a standing scope statement that cannot be removed from the template.
That last point is deliberate. The limitations statement is part of the document, not an option, because a report that travels without it is the main way this modality causes harm.
- Consistent structure. The same sections every time, so trends across sessions mean something.
- Client history. Previous sessions available for comparison, with dates and service type.
- Multilingual delivery. Client-facing output available across the languages the platform supports.
- Locked scope statement. The limitations text is fixed in the template and cannot be edited out.
- No protocol generator. The platform does not tie scores to products, dosages or treatment plans.
Standards we ask you to hold to
These are conditions of working with QMH tooling under the QMH name, not suggestions. They exist because the commercial risk in this field is concentrated almost entirely in how practitioners talk to clients.
- Do not diagnose, and do not describe output as a diagnosis, detection or screening result.
- Do not name conditions, pathogens, parasites, allergies or deficiencies as findings.
- Do not advise a client to start, stop or change a medication or treatment.
- Do not present the service as equivalent or superior to any medical test.
- Do not quote accuracy percentages. There is no substantiated figure to quote.
- Do refer to a doctor when a client describes a symptom, every time, without hedging.
- Do give the client the report with its scope statement intact.
Support model
Sessions are scheduled directly and run remotely. Longer immersions and research-oriented engagements exist and are quoted separately because they are scoped per practitioner.
| Package | What it covers | Format |
|---|---|---|
| Advanced support | Workflow, reporting and software behaviour questions for working technicians. | Two one-hour sessions. |
| Expert support pack | Deeper guidance on session workflow, report writing and client communication. | Two one-hour sessions plus written follow-up. |
| Premium support | Extended support for practitioners running higher session volumes. | Three one-hour sessions. |
If you want to contribute to the evidence
QMH is funding a blinded diagnostic-accuracy feasibility study and would rather have a rigorous negative answer than continue with an unresolved one. Practitioners with access to a clinical setting, or with an interest in how such a study should be designed, are welcome to get in touch.
The protocol is non-interventional, the host institution holds the data and controls the methodology, analysis is by an independent statistician, and publication is committed in advance regardless of outcome.
Questions people ask before booking
The reporting platform is built around NLS session output. Compatibility with your specific setup is the first thing to check in a support session.
No. QMH provides tooling and support. It does not issue clinical credentials and does not represent any training as a medical qualification.
No. It is fixed in the template. A report without it is the single most common way this modality gets providers into trouble.
You are. Advertising and medical-device rules differ by jurisdiction, and the practitioner who made a claim to a client is the person a regulator will look at.